Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with family doctors’ listening
- Patients’ rating of family doctor’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with family doctor’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their doctor involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with family doctor availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their family doctor
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Client experience
- Client experience with courtesy and respect
- Client experience with listening
- Client experience with reaching their case manager
- Client experience with case manager (help with community services)
- Client experience with care plan involvement
- Client experience with care plan meeting needs
- Client experience with independence (home set-up)
- Client experience with independence (staff encouragement)
- Client experience with personal care staff capability
- Client experience with communication about a visit cancellation
- Client experience with pain management
- Client experience with reviewing medications
- Client experience with help to stay at home
- Client experience with family doctor being informed
- Client overall care experience
- Delivery of Care
- Resident Experience
- Resident experience of staff treating them with respect
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with staff dependability
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experience with personal connections with staff
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience with presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care


Designated Supported Living
Return to emergency department
Percentage of designated supportive living (DSL), or long term care (LTC), residents that returned to the emergency department within 72 hours or 30 days of their initial or previous visit to the emergency department. (see data dictionary)
Data courtesy of Alberta Health Services and Alberta Health
What do you think?
- Looking at these results over time, are there differences between zones? Between designated supportive living and long term care? What factors could account for these differences?
Understanding “return to emergency department”
Emergency department visits are typically infrequent and necessary only when there is a critical and time-sensitive healthcare need. When patients use the emergency department multiple times in close succession, it is important to understand why. Monitoring returns to the emergency department can help us to understand if residents in designated supportive living and long term care are getting the care they need at the right time and right location.
For example, a return to the emergency department within 72 hours might indicate the resident:
- Was not ready to be discharged or released from the emergency department,
- Has complex health needs and requires time-sensitive, specialized care (e.g., palliative or end of life care) that cannot be provided at the supportive living or long term care site, and/or
- Experienced a new health-related issue that required immediate attention that could not be provided on-site.
A return to the emergency department within 30 days might indicate:
- A continued or rapid change in the health status of a resident or
- The resident’s complex health needs still require time-sensitive, specialized care (e.g., palliative or end of life care) that cannot be provided at the supportive living or long term care site.
This chart does not indicate if the resident returned to the emergency department for the same reason or a new reason.
Considerations when viewing the results:
When thinking about designated supportive living and long term care residents that return to the emergency department, providers and leaders can consider a number of things to better understand and improve these results. Some questions they could ask before taking action include:
- What are the reasons residents return to the emergency department? What are the most responsible diagnoses for residents who visit the emergency department?
- How might improved collaboration between acute care, emergency medical services, and continuing care operators improve appropriate use of the emergency department? How can we improve the quality of transitions for residents between a site and the emergency department to help prevent return visits to the emergency department?
- How can sites be better prepared and supported to provide care or services to residents who are experiencing a rapid change in health status?
Alberta Quality Matrix for Health
The Health Quality Council of Alberta uses the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health as a way of organizing information and thinking around the complexity of the healthcare system. This measure can be used as input to assess supported living’s performance in these dimensions of quality: Acceptability, Accessibility, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Safety.