Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with family doctors’ listening
- Patients’ rating of family doctor’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with family doctor’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their doctor involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with family doctor availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their family doctor
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Client experience
- Client experience with courtesy and respect
- Client experience with listening
- Client experience with reaching their case manager
- Client experience with case manager (help with community services)
- Client experience with care plan involvement
- Client experience with care plan meeting needs
- Client experience with independence (home set-up)
- Client experience with independence (staff encouragement)
- Client experience with personal care staff capability
- Client experience with communication about a visit cancellation
- Client experience with pain management
- Client experience with reviewing medications
- Client experience with help to stay at home
- Client experience with family doctor being informed
- Client overall care experience
- Delivery of Care
- Resident Experience
- Resident experience of staff treating them with respect
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with staff dependability
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experience with personal connections with staff
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience with presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care


Long Term Care
Placement into preferred living option
Percentage of residents placed into their most preferred long term care (LTC), or designated supportive living (DSL), living option for each quarter. (see data dictionary)
Alberta Health Services, Analytics. “Living Options – Preferred and Temporary”. (2019). [Dashboard showing percent placed in preferred and temporary living option, by province, zone, and level of care, by fiscal year]. AHS Tableau Reporting Platform. Retrieved from https://tableau.ahs.ca.
What do you think?
- Looking at these results over time, are there differences between zones? Between designated supportive living and long term care? What factors could account for these differences?
Understanding “placement into preferred living option”
This measure reports the percentage of residents that are placed into their most preferred living option. These results do not include placement into other preferred living options.
An individual is asked to choose at least one most preferred living option and other preferred options when transitioning into designated supportive living or long term care. Possible sites for them to identify as their most preferred or preferred site are based on options that are able to meet a resident’s assessed unmet needs (e.g., assistance with activities of daily living like meal preparation and toileting, ventilator support, a secured unit). Some factors that can influence a resident or alternative decision-maker’s preference include age of the site, location and the distance for loved one’s to travel, being able to live with a family member, and the cultural or religious affiliation of the site.
Individuals are offered a living option based on standardized guidelines for vacancy management. Most living option sites have a waitlist of residents who have accepted a temporary location while they wait for their most preferred site, in addition to other individuals who have identified the site as most preferred or preferred.
It can be difficult for the continuing care system to place people in their most preferred living option. The system must balance individual preferences and care needs with the available spaces and the wider preferences and care needs of the larger population.
Residents who accept a preferred or temporary living option are automatically placed on the waitlist with priority ranking for their most preferred living option. When residents are offered to relocate to their most preferred site, many elect to stay in their preferred site. This is not captured in these results.
Considerations when viewing the results:
When thinking about placement into a preferred living option, providers and leaders can consider a number of things to better understand and improve these results. Some questions they could ask before taking action include:
- How does capacity or available spaces impact whether a person gets placed into their most preferred living option?
- In addition to capacity, what other factors can prevent potential residents from getting into their preferred living option?
- Beyond those mentioned above, what are some common criteria residents and their loved ones use to identify their most preferred living option?
- What resources and information are available to help residents and family members identify their most preferred site (e.g., word of mouth, the Alberta Health Services Continuing Care Facility Directory)? How is the public informed about these resources and information? Are these resources and information being shared consistently? If not, how might this be improved?
- Who is the primary decision-maker around the preferred living option? The resident or loved one? How might this change which living option is identified as the “most preferred”?
Alberta Quality Matrix for Health
The Health Quality Council of Alberta uses the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health as a way of organizing information and thinking around the complexity of the healthcare system. This measure can be used as input to assess long term care’s performance in these dimensions of quality: Acceptability, Accessibility, Appropriateness, Efficiency.