Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with family doctors’ listening
- Patients’ rating of family doctor’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with family doctor’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their doctor involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with family doctor availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their family doctor
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Client experience
- Client experience with courtesy and respect
- Client experience with listening
- Client experience with reaching their case manager
- Client experience with case manager (help with community services)
- Client experience with care plan involvement
- Client experience with care plan meeting needs
- Client experience with independence (home set-up)
- Client experience with independence (staff encouragement)
- Client experience with personal care staff capability
- Client experience with communication about a visit cancellation
- Client experience with pain management
- Client experience with reviewing medications
- Client experience with help to stay at home
- Client experience with family doctor being informed
- Client overall care experience
- Delivery of Care
- Resident Experience
- Resident experience of staff treating them with respect
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with staff dependability
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experience with personal connections with staff
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience with presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care


Designated Supported Living
Readmission into acute care within 7 days
Percentage of designated supportive living (DSL), or long term care (LTC), residents readmitted to the hospital within seven days of discharge. (see data dictionary)
Data courtesy of Alberta Health Services and Alberta Health
What do you think?
- Looking at these results over time, are there differences between zones? Between designated supportive living and long term care? What factors could account for these differences?
Understanding “residents readmitted into acute care within seven days of discharge”
This measure tells us what percentage of designated supportive living and long term care residents were readmitted to acute care within seven days of discharge.
Higher percentages of residents that return to the hospital within a week after being discharged from the hospital may indicate that poor transitions are occurring between acute care and the resident’s site or that a site lacks the resources (e.g., staff with necessary skills, equipment, etc.) required to care for and support the resident.
One reason transitions can be challenging is because of information continuity. Information between acute care, emergency medical services, continuing care operators, and the resident and their loved ones is not easily shared, which can make it difficult to support residents as they move between areas of the healthcare system. For example, a resident may return to a site with incomplete information about how to continue and follow up with care, and if the resident and their loved ones were not involved in the discharge plan, information gaps can be difficult to address.
It is important for discharge plans to contain complete information about the resident’s hospital visit, including diagnosis and treatments done. In addition, sometimes discharge plans include elements that cannot be delivered at the resident’s long term care or designated supportive living site. This can result in gaps in care and support or confusion that might result in readmission to acute care.
Considerations when viewing the results:
When thinking about readmissions to acute care from continuing care, providers and leaders can consider a number of things to better understand and improve these results. Some questions they could ask before taking action include:
- What are some of the reasons why residents might be readmitted to hospital shortly after discharge? Which of these reasons are avoidable and within a site’s control?
- How might continuing care providers collaborate with acute care and/or emergency medical services to address reduce avoidable reasons for readmission?
- How can the quality of transitions between acute care and continuing care sites improve to deliver better and safer care experiences?
Alberta Quality Matrix for Health
The Health Quality Council of Alberta uses the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health as a way of organizing information and thinking around the complexity of the healthcare system. This measure can be used as input to assess supported living’s performance in these dimensions of quality: Accessibility, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Safety.