Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with primary care providers’ listening
- Patients’ rating of primary care provider’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with primary care provider’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their primary care provider involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with primary care provider availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their primary care provider
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Client experience
- Thinking of the home care services you received through a government home care program, did these services help you stay at home?
- How often did professional home care staff listen carefully to you?
- How often were you satisfied with the way your personal care service concerns were handled?
- Your personal care staff had a warm presence?
- Did professional home care services meet your needs for setting up your home so you could move around safely?
- How do you feel about the number of different professional care staff you have had?
- Did professional home care services meet your needs for managing your pain?
- How often did personal care staff listen carefully to you?
- How often did personal care staff explain things in a way that was easy to understand?
- Your personal care staff were very supportive when they talked with you?
- How often did professional home care staff explain things in a way that was easy to understand?
- You felt that your personal care staff were attentive to you?
- Overall how would you rate your personal care services?
- How do you feel about the number of different personal care staff you have had?
- Overall how would you rate your professional home care services?
- Overall how would you rate the quality of your home care services?
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience of resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care
- Resident experience
- Resident overall experience
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Delivery of care
- Resident experience
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
Continuing Care Homes: Type A
Long Term Care
Family experience with staffing
How family members rated their experience with the number of staff available to support their loved one, in a 2022-23 survey. (see data definition)
What do you think?
- Why does the family member experience with the number of staff available matter?
- Are there differences between zones? What factors could account for these differences?
- How is this result related to family experience with staff responsiveness or continuity of staff?
- How are family experience results around staffing levels different in continuing care homes – type B (formerly designated supportive living)?
Understanding “family experience with staffing”
In a survey conducted in 2022-23, Health Quality Albertaasked family members of residents living in continuing care homes – type A (formerly long term care):
In the last three months, how often did you feel that there were enough nurses and aides in the continuing care home?
Family members could answer either “Never / Sometimes / Usually / Always”
When family members feel there is enough staff to support the needs of their loved one, there is an increased likelihood of a positive experience with care and services. Aspects of staffing and relationships with staff have a strong influence on the overall experience of care from the family member’s perspective.
Considerations when viewing the results:
There are a number of factors providers and leaders can consider if looking to improve family members’ overall experience of care. Before taking action, consider the following:
- What expectations do family members have about staffing? Family member perspectives may differ in the degree to which they feel there are “enough” staff at a site and how often staff need to be present.
- How might family member experiences with staffing differ from the resident?
- How can overall funding impact family member perception of staffing? Staffing is linked to acuity, or intensity of care required, and not a simple staff-to-resident ratio (e.g., one staff member for every five residents). The activities a site needs to offer in order to meet a resident’s assessed needs is typically determined by the overall acuity of the residents at each site. This means that when a higher volume and higher intensity of activities or care is required, the site’s funding reflects this. A site with an overall higher acuity population of residents are funded for things like more staff relative to a site with an overall lower acuity population of residents.
- How is this staffing formula communicated to residents and family members, to help understand why some sites might appear to be staffed differently than others?
- Why are some sites performing better? How are those doing better managing resources differently? What types of staffing and staffing arrangements foster better experiences?
- Which accommodation standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Which Continuing Care Health Service Standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Who should be involved in discussions to improve these results? How could residents and/or family members be engaged to develop solutions (e.g., engage the resident and family council)? What other collaboration might be required to make improvements in this area?
For information about Health Quality Alberta’s Facility-based Continuing Care Survey, please visit Health Quality Albertawebsite.
