Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with primary care providers’ listening
- Patients’ rating of primary care provider’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with primary care provider’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their primary care provider involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with primary care provider availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their primary care provider
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Client experience
- Thinking of the home care services you received through a government home care program, did these services help you stay at home?
- How often did professional home care staff listen carefully to you?
- How often were you satisfied with the way your personal care service concerns were handled?
- Your personal care staff had a warm presence?
- Did professional home care services meet your needs for setting up your home so you could move around safely?
- How do you feel about the number of different professional care staff you have had?
- Did professional home care services meet your needs for managing your pain?
- How often did personal care staff listen carefully to you?
- How often did personal care staff explain things in a way that was easy to understand?
- Your personal care staff were very supportive when they talked with you?
- How often did professional home care staff explain things in a way that was easy to understand?
- You felt that your personal care staff were attentive to you?
- Overall how would you rate your personal care services?
- How do you feel about the number of different personal care staff you have had?
- Overall how would you rate your professional home care services?
- Overall how would you rate the quality of your home care services?
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience of resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care
- Resident experience
- Resident overall experience
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Delivery of care
- Resident experience
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
Continuing Care Homes: Type B
Designated Supported Living
Family experience with decision-making
How family members rated their involvement in making decisions about their loved one’s care, in a 2022-23 survey. (see data definition)
What do you think?
- Why does family member involvement in decision-making matter?
- How are family experience results for decision-making different in continuing care homes – type A (formerly called long term care)? Why are they different?
Understanding “family experience with decision-making”
In a survey conducted in 2022-23, Health Quality Alberta asked family members of residents living in continuing care homes – type B (formerly designated supportive living):
In the last three months, how often were you involved as much as you wanted to be in the decisions about your family member’s care?
Family members could choose “Never / Sometimes / Usually / Always”
From Health Quality Albertasurvey results, family member overall experience of care is likely better when they feel involved with their loved one’s care. Family members particularly appreciate when staff keep them informed, and support their involvement in care. This is also a key pillar in patient- and family-centred care.
Considerations when viewing the results:
There are a number of factors providers and leaders can consider if looking to improve family members involvement in decision-making about their loved one’s care. Before taking action, consider the following:
- This question says “as much as [they] wanted” to be involved, because family members’ preference for level of involvement can differ. How are family members being engaged by site staff to understand how much they want to be involved? How can the site communicate their openness to family involvement? How are those expectations being set together? How are the outcomes of those discussions being shared with the broader care team?
- How can a site make sure those expectations for involvement are honoured as much as possible?
- In what contexts are family members involved in care (e.g., family conferences)? Who is involved in these opportunities, including both provider and resident and family representatives, and how often do they occur?
- To what extent can family members be involved in their loved one’s care? How can those who might not be the primary decision-maker be involved in decision-making? Sometimes, the family member answering the survey may not be entitled to all the information they feel they need, and may not be the one who is entitled to attend or participate in care conferences.
- To what extent should family members be involved in their loved one’s care?
- When there are differing views or opinions, how are resident and family member preferences balanced? How does the role of primary decision-maker factor in? When there are multiple family members or loved ones involved, what are some effective approaches to facilitating these discussions? How are staff trained or educated about how to navigate these potentially challenging and emotional conversations?
- How are relationships established and maintained between a family member and their loved one’s case manager?
- How do family members know who to ask for information about their loved one’s care?
- What are other barriers family members may face to feeling involved in decisions about their loved ones care and services? Could barriers beyond the site’s control be a factor (e.g., geographic, language, privacy legislation, etc.)?
- Residents in designated supportive living may be more independent than residents in long-term care. How might this impact the family members’ desire or need to be informed about the residents’ care and services?
- Which accommodation standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Which Continuing Care Health Service Standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Who should be involved in discussions to improve these results? How could residents and/or family members be engaged to develop solutions (e.g., engage the resident and family council)? What other collaboration might be required to make improvements in this area?
- A site may only be directly accountable for one type of staff. For example, in continuing care homes – type B (formerly called designated supportive living), case management and sometimes nursing care are delivered by Alberta Health Services, while other services like care aides and housekeeping are managed by a housing provider or site operator. How can providers collaborate to make sure improvements are embraced by all staff?
For information about Health Quality Alberta’s Facility-based Continuing Care Survey, please visit Health Quality Alberta’s website.
