Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with primary care providers’ listening
- Patients’ rating of primary care provider’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with primary care provider’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their primary care provider involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with primary care provider availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their primary care provider
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Client experience
- Thinking of the home care services you received through a government home care program, did these services help you stay at home?
- How often did professional home care staff listen carefully to you?
- How often were you satisfied with the way your personal care service concerns were handled?
- Your personal care staff had a warm presence?
- Did professional home care services meet your needs for setting up your home so you could move around safely?
- How do you feel about the number of different professional care staff you have had?
- Did professional home care services meet your needs for managing your pain?
- How often did personal care staff listen carefully to you?
- How often did personal care staff explain things in a way that was easy to understand?
- Your personal care staff were very supportive when they talked with you?
- How often did professional home care staff explain things in a way that was easy to understand?
- You felt that your personal care staff were attentive to you?
- Overall how would you rate your personal care services?
- How do you feel about the number of different personal care staff you have had?
- Overall how would you rate your professional home care services?
- Overall how would you rate the quality of your home care services?
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience of resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care
- Resident experience
- Resident overall experience
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Delivery of care
- Resident experience
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
Continuing Care Homes: Type B
Designated Supported Living
Resident experiences with activities
How residents rated their satisfaction with the activities offered at their site in a 2022-23 survey. (see data definition)
What do you think?
- Why does satisfaction with the activities offered at a site matter?
- Are there differences between zones? Between providers? Between mainly rural and urban zones or sites? What factors could account for these differences?
Understanding “resident experiences with activities”
In a survey conducted in 2022-23, Health Quality Alberta asked residents living in continuing care homes – type B (formerly designated supportive living):
Are you satisfied with the activities offered here?
Residents could choose “Yes, always / Yes, sometimes / No, hardly ever / No, never”
Activities can be things like entertainment, arts and crafts, religious services, outings, and exercise classes. Having meaningful activities to participate in is a common theme when it comes to quality of life and bringing joy and meaning to a resident’s life. The variety, number, and choice of activities available to residents can impact a resident’s overall experience at a site. For example, a resident’s overall experience of care and services is often more positive if their experiences with activities are also positive.
Considerations when viewing the results:
There are a number of factors providers and leaders can consider to better understand and improve resident satisfaction with activities. Before taking action, consider the following:
- What information is gathered about the variety, number, and choice of activities that would be meaningful for residents? How often is this information collected and offerings reviewed or refreshed? How are individual and collective resident interests considered and how do activity offerings evolve to meet changing interests?
- How do residents feel about the quality of the activities offered? Which activities give the residents a sense of purpose or meaning?
- How is the quality of activities balanced with the number and choice of activities offered?
- How are individual resident abilities and capacity to participate in activities taken into account? What assumptions might staff make about a resident’s ability or capacity?
- Some residents may not want to participate in the activities offered by the site. Why do you think this is? What are some benefits of encouraging participation? When and how might encouragement be appropriate and beneficial?
- Who else (e.g., staff, loved ones, volunteers, etc.) is integrated into these activities? How is that done, if at all?
- Which accommodation standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Which Continuing Care Health Service Standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Who should be involved in discussions to improve these results? How could residents and/or family members be engaged to develop solutions? What other collaboration might be required to make improvements in this area?
- A site may only be directly accountable for one type of staff. For example, in designated supportive living, case management and sometimes nursing care are delivered by Alberta Health Services, while other services like care aides and housekeeping are managed by a housing provider or site operator. How can providers collaborate to improve this result?
For information about Health Quality Alberta’s Facility-based Continuing Care survey, please visit Health Quality Alberta’s website.
