Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with family doctors’ listening
- Patients’ rating of family doctor’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with family doctor’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their doctor involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with family doctor availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their family doctor
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Patient experience
- Delivery of care
- Client experience
- Client experience with courtesy and respect
- Client experience with listening
- Client experience with reaching their case manager
- Client experience with case manager (help with community services)
- Client experience with care plan involvement
- Client experience with care plan meeting needs
- Client experience with independence (home set-up)
- Client experience with independence (staff encouragement)
- Client experience with personal care staff capability
- Client experience with communication about a visit cancellation
- Client experience with pain management
- Client experience with reviewing medications
- Client experience with help to stay at home
- Client experience with family doctor being informed
- Client overall care experience
- Delivery of Care
- Resident Experience
- Resident experience of staff treating them with respect
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with staff dependability
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experience with personal connections with staff
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience with presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care


Designated Supported Living
Family experience with courtesy and respect
How family members rated how often staff treat their loved one with courtesy and respect, in a 2019 survey. (see data dictionary)
What do you think?
- What does showing respect mean to you? What does it mean to residents and family members?
- Why does the respectful and courteous treatment of a resident matter?
- Are results different for families with loved ones in long term care? If so, why are they different?
- Are results different for residents than they are for family members? If so, why?
Understanding “family experience with courtesy and respect”
In a survey conducted in 2019, the HQCA asked family members of residents living in designated supportive living:
In the last six months, how often did you see the nurses and aides treat your family member with courtesy and respect?
Family members could choose “Never / Sometimes / Usually / Always”
When staff act thoughtfully and show they sincerely understand and value a resident’s unique feelings, wishes, rights, or abilities, this demonstrates courtesy and respect. It is important to family members that their loved ones be cared for with a courteous and respectful attitude and approach.
Family member’s overall rating of care and services is likely better if they feel their loved one is treated with courtesy and respect (National Centre for Biotechnology Information).
Considerations when viewing the results:
There are a number of factors providers and leaders can consider to better understand and improve family member experiences with courtesy and respect. Before taking action, consider the following:
- Family members were asked about how staff interact with their loved one, and in particular how “nurses and aides” treat them. Family members may not be able to clearly differentiate between nurses and aides or other staff at the site, however this provides information about how family members feel care staff engage with their loved one. Therefore, it is important to consider what it means at your site to be respectful and courteous when caring for or interacting with residents and families? What does that look like? How are staff supported to deliver care and services in a respectful and courteous manner (e.g., training, education, or feedback)?
- What expectations do family members have regarding the courteous and respectful treatment of their loved one? What might influence their perspective?
- How might a family member’s experience of courtesy and respect differ from the resident?
- Cultural differences can sometimes influence expectations and experiences with courtesy and respect. How could cultural competency be strengthened within a site, organization, or across the healthcare system?
- Which Supportive Living Accommodation Standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Which Continuing Care Health Service Standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- A site may only be directly accountable for one type of staff. For example, in designated supportive living, case management and sometimes nursing care are delivered by Alberta Health Services, while other services like care aides and housekeeping are managed by a housing provider or site operator. How can providers collaborate to make sure approaches to courtesy and respect and improvements are embraced by all staff?
For information about the HQCA’s designated supportive living family experience survey, please visit the HQCA website.
Alberta Quality Matrix for Health
The Health Quality Council of Alberta uses the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health as a way of organizing information and thinking around the complexity of the healthcare system. This measure can be used as input to assess supported living’s performance in these dimensions of quality: Acceptability and Appropriateness.