Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with family doctors’ listening
- Patients’ rating of family doctor’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with family doctor’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their doctor involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with family doctor availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their family doctor
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Client experience
- Client experience with courtesy and respect
- Client experience with listening
- Client experience with reaching their case manager
- Client experience with case manager (help with community services)
- Client experience with care plan involvement
- Client experience with care plan meeting needs
- Client experience with independence (home set-up)
- Client experience with independence (staff encouragement)
- Client experience with personal care staff capability
- Client experience with communication about a visit cancellation
- Client experience with pain management
- Client experience with reviewing medications
- Client experience with help to stay at home
- Client experience with family doctor being informed
- Client overall care experience
- Delivery of Care
- Resident Experience
- Resident experience of staff treating them with respect
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with staff dependability
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experience with personal connections with staff
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience with presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care


Designated Supported Living
Resident experiences with activities
How residents rated their satisfaction with the activities offered at their site in a 2019 survey. (see data dictionary)
What do you think?
- Why does satisfaction with the activities offered at a site matter?
- Are there differences between zones? Between providers? Between mainly rural and urban zones or sites? What factors could account for these differences?
Understanding “resident experiences with activities”
In a survey conducted in 2019, the HQCA asked residents living in designated supportive living:
Are you satisfied with the activities offered here?
Residents could choose “Yes, always / Yes, sometimes / No, hardly ever / No, never”
Activities can be things like entertainment, arts and crafts, religious services, outings, and exercise classes. Having meaningful activities to participate in is a common theme when it comes to quality of life and bringing joy and meaning to a resident’s life. The variety, number, and choice of activities available to residents can impact a resident’s overall experience at a site. For example, a resident’s overall experience of care and services is often more positive if their experiences with activities are also positive.
Considerations when viewing the results:
There are a number of factors providers and leaders can consider to better understand and improve resident satisfaction with activities. Before taking action, consider the following:
- What information is gathered about the variety, number, and choice of activities that would be meaningful for residents? How often is this information collected and offerings reviewed or refreshed? How are individual and collective resident interests considered and how do activity offerings evolve to meet changing interests?
- How do residents feel about the quality of the activities offered? Which activities give the residents a sense of purpose or meaning?
- How is the quality of activities balanced with the number and choice of activities offered?
- How are individual resident abilities and capacity to participate in activities taken into account? What assumptions might staff make about a resident’s ability or capacity?
- Some residents may not want to participate in the activities offered by the site. Why do you think this is? What are some benefits of encouraging participation? When and how might encouragement be appropriate and beneficial?
- Who else (e.g., staff, loved ones, volunteers, etc.) is integrated into these activities? How is that done, if at all?
- Which Supportive Living Accommodation Standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Which Continuing Care Health Service Standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Who should be involved in discussions to improve these results? How could residents and/or family members be engaged to develop solutions? What other collaboration might be required to make improvements in this area?
- A site may only be directly accountable for one type of staff. For example, in designated supportive living, case management and sometimes nursing care are delivered by Alberta Health Services, while other services like care aides and housekeeping are managed by a housing provider or site operator. How can providers collaborate to improve this result?
For information about the HQCA’s designated supportive living resident experience survey, please visit the HQCA website.
Alberta Quality Matrix for Health
The Health Quality Council of Alberta uses the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health as a way of organizing information and thinking around the complexity of the healthcare system. This measure can be used as input to assess supported living’s performance in these dimensions of quality: Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Efficiency.